wso2 - wso2esb - REST API Failure doing XML to XML mapping -

-

failure scenarios listed in red

i not able make call rest backend browser[rest client] using wso2 esb when trying scenarios listed in red.

content type , messageformatter tried, doing wrong or limitation of rest api.

source code scenario :

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <api xmlns="http://ws.apache.org/ns/synapse" name="invokeasservice" context="/invokews" hostname="10.203.101.76">     <resource methods="get" uri-template="/{str1}">         <insequence>             <log level="full" separator=",">                 <property name="sequence" value="** request recieved**"/>             </log>             <property name="rest_url_postfix" expression="fn:concat('/get?id=',get-property('uri.var.str1'))" scope="axis2" type="string"/>             <send>                 <endpoint>                     <address uri="http://10.203.101.76:9765/services/personinfoservice.personinfoservicehttpendpoint/"/>                 </endpoint>             </send>         </insequence>         <outsequence>             <log level="full" separator=",">                 <property name="sequence" value="** message recieved**"/>             </log>             <property name="contenttype" value="application/xml" scope="axis2"/>             <send/>         </outsequence>         <faultsequence/>     </resource> </api>

browser error:

error message on browser

#####################update#####################

scenario seems work after changing source

<api xmlns="http://ws.apache.org/ns/synapse" name="invokeasservice" context="/invokews" hostname="10.203.101.76">    <resource methods="get" uri-template="/{str1}">       <insequence>          <log level="full" separator=",">             <property name="sequence" value="** request recieved**"/>          </log>          <property name="rest_url_postfix" expression="fn:concat('/get?id=',get-property('uri.var.str1'))" scope="axis2" type="string"/>          <send>             <endpoint>                <address uri="http://10.203.101.76:9765/services/personinfoservice.personinfoservicehttpendpoint/"/>             </endpoint>          </send>       </insequence>       <outsequence>          <send/>       </outsequence>       <faultsequence/>    </resource> </api>

but, scenario c still unsolved puzzle response coming in xml format. tried adding following outsequence. not help

<outsequence>             <property name="messagetype" value="application/json" scope="axis2" type="string"/>             <send/>         </outsequence>


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ...
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more

c++ - Warning : overflow in implicit constant conversion -

-
in following program, line 5 give overflow warning expected, surprisingly line 4 doesn't give warning in gcc: http://www.ideone.com/u0bxn int main() { int = 256; char c1 = i; //line 4 char c2 = 256; //line 5 return 0; } i thinking both lines should give overflow warning. or there i'm missing? the topic led me experiment this: typedef type checking? there said following(which deleted answer, because when run it, didn't show had expected): //however, you'll warning case: typedef int t1; typedef char t2; t1 x = 256; t2 y = x; //possible overflow warning! (but doesn't give warning :() -wall doesn't include many options. -wconversion 1 of them , warns behavior you're interested in. see http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/warning-options.html
Read more