Salesforce integration all-or-nothing -

-

we have customer makes use of salesforce, want develop own site perform multitude of functions of require integration salesforce data , functionality.

in discussions salesforce vendor , our customer, salesforce vendor pushed customer in salesforce itself, in portal solution entire website run through salesforce, or switch basic html pages on own server salesforce pages (skinned customer's site).

surely recommendation not in best interests of customer?

doesn't restrict , limit salesforce technologies , costs?

long term, if company decided in future expand , build web based functionality totally separate salesforce happen?

let me know think , possibly give me link or 2 motivate you're saying. i'm hoping system/application architects ones answer, not salesforce vendors.

thanks, jacques

they may have been talking salesforce sites. allow build lot of custom functionality, , leverage power of salesforce platform. said, lock in somewhat. limit can do. depends functionality salesforce want expose customers through site. may case salesforce customer portal (skinned fit corporate , feel) suffice, , can leave existing site alone.

the other option build functionality on own site using soap or rest based apis salesforce offer. has it's pros , cons too. offers more flexibility want site, , can switch hosting provider site relatively easily. switch php asp site , still have same functionality. of takes time develop. can used way around expensive salesforce licenses though, , salesforce becomes fancy database site in regards.

without knowing how of data/functionality within salesforce customer wants on site, , want website, difficult give clear answer though.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - Mailx and Gmail nss config dir -

-
i trying send mail linux command line using mailx command. can send local domain no problem want set mail send gmail account receive mail sent gmail account. after configuring mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore } i error: resolving host smtp.gmail.com . . . done. connecting 74.125.25.109 . . . connected. missing "nss-config-dir" variable. "/home/username/dead.letter" 11/354 . . . message not sent. after looking "nss-config-dir" here , located certn.db , keyn.db files , added mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore set nss-config-dir=/home/user/.mozilla/firefox/location.default } now when try send mail using command: echo "sent gmail account" | mailx -v -a
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more