django - Automatically posting to facebook page with python -

-

i want make script lets me post facebook fan page (which i'm admin of)

as far i've seen, graph api examples making facebook apps in python , make them communicate python, quite different want.

also graph api requires oauth token, documentation claims it's obtained doing:

https://www.facebook.com/dialog/oauth? client_id=your_app_id&redirect_uri=your_url

i think implies:

a) have create facebook app this, didn't think necessary (after it's require standard credentials , wouldn't used other people), fine. have app created task.

b) need url, don't have, because it's script.

any ideas on should info?

first need facebook_app_id , facebook_app_secret, facebook when register app.

then include needed urls.

redirect_client_url = 'http://your-redirect-url' access_token_url = 'https://graph.facebook.com/oauth/access_token?client_id='+consumer_key+'&redirect_uri='+red   irect_client_url+'&client_secret='+consumer_secret+'&code=' scope = 'publish_stream,offline_access,user_birthday,email' authorize_url = 'https://graph.facebook.com/oauth/authorize?client_id='+consumer_key+'&redirect_uri='+redirect_client_url+'&scope='+scope+'&display=touch' user_info_url = 'https://graph.facebook.com/me?access_token='

your consumer key , consumer secret facebook app id , facebook app secret respectively.

you access_token following oauth2.0 guidelines , store access_token , fan page idsomewhere in database. https://github.com/simplegeo/python-oauth2 example on how oauth token. when try post use access token using this.

post_data = {'access_token':access_token, 'message':'hey test!'} request_path = str(facebook_id)+'/feed' post_data = urllib.urlencode(post_data) response = urllib2.urlopen('https://graph.facebook.com/%s' % request_path, post_data)

this should work posting user's wall. sure posting facebook fan page should similar.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - Mailx and Gmail nss config dir -

-
i trying send mail linux command line using mailx command. can send local domain no problem want set mail send gmail account receive mail sent gmail account. after configuring mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore } i error: resolving host smtp.gmail.com . . . done. connecting 74.125.25.109 . . . connected. missing "nss-config-dir" variable. "/home/username/dead.letter" 11/354 . . . message not sent. after looking "nss-config-dir" here , located certn.db , keyn.db files , added mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore set nss-config-dir=/home/user/.mozilla/firefox/location.default } now when try send mail using command: echo "sent gmail account" | mailx -v -a
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more