Django admin: hide read-only fields on new records? -

-

i'm using django admin site readonly fields on records:

class bookadmin(admin.modeladmin):     fieldsets = [     (none, {'fields': ['title', 'library_id', 'is_missing', \                        'transactions_all_time']}),     ]     readonly_fields = ['transactions_all_time',]     list_display = ('library_id', 'author', 'title')

this works great when editing records - transactions_all_time field read-only, want.

however, when adding new records behaves bit oddly. read-only section @ bottom of page, can't edit , irrelevant @ point.

it better if field not present @ when adding new records.

is there django option not displaying read-only fields while adding new record? know can hack css on add_form.html hide it, there better way?

thanks.

i had similar problem. resolved this

class mymodeladmin(admin.modeladmin):     readonly_fields = ('field_one',)     def get_readonly_fields(self, request, obj=none):         if obj: # editing             return self.readonly_fields         return ()

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Javascript line number mapping -

-
magically formatted comments change reported line number of javascript errors in browsers; this: //@line n "f" n line number , f file name. unfortunately, //@line appears ungoogleable. know there documentation on feature, , browsers support it? (i found references here , here .) from can find available in mozilla based browsers. it using js_setoptions command can turn these options on or off depending on values passed. https://developer.mozilla.org/en/js_setoptions
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ...
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more