design - dreamweaver vs alternative systems eg notepad++, flux, coda -


my main question whether beneficial hand code or use dreamweaver or other wysiwyg editors.

i'd find out peoples views on whether dreamweaver way go when coding websites today.

my current background , situation
using coda in combination textexpander , developing on macintosh system.

my boss has requested move dreamweaver in attempt make designing sites quicker through use of wysiwyg.

would making move dreamweaver beneficial or using current system more beneficial in long run assuming more understanding of hand coding , gain experience through time.

i leaning towards writing report stating moving dreamweaver without trainer isn't idea.

i've developed 2 webpages
http://digitalgenesis.com.au (personal site)
http://www.aicm.org.au (work site)

so far have fair bit of understanding css, html, li, links, etc.

my current weaknesses not understand how page layouts work still rusty on floats despite reading few articles on subject. hinders extent on how fast can code pages.

to clarify,i not yet required make websites other clients, employed government grant , have been working on own aicm webpage.

editors dreamweaver easy & fast work on. dw displays options particular attribute & hints unclosed tags in code. way easy diagnose problem in code. in dw can hand code in code window or select element & code. newbie great explore software & html also.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - Mailx and Gmail nss config dir -

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -