xml - Is it possible to restrict elements to a max occur in a "choice" block? -

-

i need solve following problem.

//pseudo algorithm

  • you have 4 elements: elm1, elm2, elm3, elm4
  • elm1 occurs 0-2 times
  • elm2 occurs 0-1 times
  • elm3 occurs 0-n times
  • elm4 occurs 0-n times
  • they can ordered in way, occur restricted given count.

//pseudo end

it seems combination of sequence , choice, both indicators have characteristic, don't allow me desired behavior.

sample: elm4 elm1 elm2 elm1 elm3 elm3 elm3 elm4

please rescue me before i'll insane :)

chris

if n values not big , you're desperate can make content model accounted every possible combination, grows complex exponentially.

the best solution use tool supports xml schema 1.1 (such xerces or saxon), relaxes restrictions on all group occurrence values. section g.1.3 of spec:

  1. several of constraints imposed version 1.0 of specification on all-groups have been relaxed:

    a. wildcards allowed in groups.

    b. value of maxoccurs may greater 1 on particles in group. elements match particular particle need not adjacent in input.

    c. groups can extended adding more members them.

failing that, general xml schema 1.0 solution specify relaxed model in schema (no limits on element occurrences) , enforce constraints care in layer, might custom code or xslt, instance.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Javascript line number mapping -

-
magically formatted comments change reported line number of javascript errors in browsers; this: //@line n "f" n line number , f file name. unfortunately, //@line appears ungoogleable. know there documentation on feature, , browsers support it? (i found references here , here .) from can find available in mozilla based browsers. it using js_setoptions command can turn these options on or off depending on values passed. https://developer.mozilla.org/en/js_setoptions
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ...
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more