templates - C++ using statement in member function scope -

-

if want use member of template base class template derived class, have bring scope such:

template <typename t> struct base {     void foo(); };  template <typename t> struct derived : base<t> {     using base<t>::foo; };

why can't place using statement local scope, other using statements?

template <typename t> struct base {     void foo(); };  template <typename t> struct derived : base<t> {     void f()     {         using base<t>::foo;  // error: base<t> not namespace     } };

the standard (draft 3225) says in [namespace.udecl]:

a using-declaration class member shall member-declaration. [ example:

struct  x  {     int  i;     static  int  s; }; void  f()  {     using  x::i; // error:  x::i class member                  // , not member declaration.     using  x::s; // error:  x::s class member                  // , not member declaration. }

— end example ]

a using-directive has no such restriction, ([namespace.udir]):

when looking namespace-name in using-directive, namespace names considered


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ...
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more