How can I create a user for ASP.Net/Umbraco SQL Membership from iPhone and WCF? -

-

so have been struggling days now, trying create new user wcf service using umbraco's membership provider. can tell me if i'm out of mind, if impossible do, or if i'm overlooking need add wcf service allow work. wcf script embedded website on iis 7.5 using .net framework 4.0.

i can return json strings wcf, such validation of input. , using iphone app.

but validates, , try run following lines... 

  membershipcreatestatus status;       membershipuser newuser = membership.createuser(email, pw1, email, "n", "n", false, out status);    if (newuser != null)   {     string newuserguid = system.guid.newguid().tostring("n");     memberprofile mp = memberprofile.getuserprofile(email);     mp.authguid = newuserguid;     mp.firstname = fname;     mp.lastname = lname;     mp.birthday = bday;     mp.displayrealname = intname;     mp.displaybirthday = intbirthday;     mp.save();     roles.addusertorole(email, "client");     return @"valid:user added";   }else     return @"error:invalid:error occurred";   }

i following error...

the server encountered error processing request. exception message 'object reference not set instance of object.'. see server logs more details. exception stack trace is:

at umbraco.cms.businesslogic.member.member.getmemberfromloginname(string loginname) @ umbraco.providers.members.umbracomembershipprovider.createuser(string username, string password, string email, string passwordquestion, string passwordanswer, boolean isapproved, object provideruserkey, membershipcreatestatus& status) @ system.web.security.membership.createuser(string username, string password, string email, string passwordquestion, string passwordanswer, boolean isapproved, object provideruserkey, membershipcreatestatus& status) @ system.web.security.membership.createuser(string username, string password, string email, string passwordquestion, string passwordanswer, boolean isapproved, membershipcreatestatus& status) @ mydll.web.ausers.registeruser(string email, string pw1, string pw2, string fname, string lname, int32 intname, string birthdate, int32 intbirthday) @ mydll.web.get.users.register(string email, string p1, string p2, string fname, string lname, string displayname, string birthdate, string displaybirth) @ syncinvokeregister(object , object[] , object[] ) @ system.servicemodel.dispatcher.syncmethodinvoker.invoke(object instance, object[] inputs, object[]& outputs) @ system.servicemodel.dispatcher.dispatchoperationruntime.invokebegin(messagerpc& rpc) @ system.servicemodel.dispatcher.immutabledispatchruntime.processmessage5(messagerpc& rpc) @ system.servicemodel.dispatcher.immutabledispatchruntime.processmessage41(messagerpc& rpc) @ system.servicemodel.dispatcher.immutabledispatchruntime.processmessage4(messagerpc& rpc) @ system.servicemodel.dispatcher.immutabledispatchruntime.processmessage31(messagerpc& rpc) @ system.servicemodel.dispatcher.immutabledispatchruntime.processmessage3(messagerpc& rpc) @ system.servicemodel.dispatcher.immutabledispatchruntime.processmessage2(messagerpc& rpc) @ system.servicemodel.dispatcher.immutabledispatchruntime.processmessage11(messagerpc& rpc) @ system.servicemodel.dispatcher.immutabledispatchruntime.processmessage1(messagerpc& rpc) @ system.servicemodel.dispatcher.messagerpc.process(boolean isoperationcontextset)

my web config section looks this...

<system.servicemodel>     <bindings>       <webhttpbinding>         <binding name="jsonbinding" maxreceivedmessagesize="2147483647">           <security mode="transport">             <transport clientcredentialtype="none" />           </security>         </binding>       </webhttpbinding>     </bindings>     <services>       <service name="mydll.users">         <endpoint address="/get/users.svc" behaviorconfiguration="jsonbehavior"           binding="webhttpbinding" bindingconfiguration="jsonbinding"           name="usersservice" contract="mydll.web.get.users" />       </service>     </services>     <behaviors>       <endpointbehaviors>         <behavior name="jsonbehavior">           <enablewebscript />         </behavior>       </endpointbehaviors>     </behaviors>     <servicehostingenvironment       multiplesitebindingsenabled="true" />   </system.servicemodel>

any whatesoever appreciated. , if buy beer or 10, would. thanks!

in umbraco member.cs, there 

httpcontext.current.trace.warn("no member loginname: " + loginname + " exists");

so got such error.

in web.config under system.servicemodel add:

<servicehostingenvironment aspnetcompatibilityenabled=”true”/>

on service class 

[aspnetcompatibilityrequirements(requirementsmode = aspnetcompatibilityrequirementsmode.required)]

for more information, please see http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa702682.aspx

http://our.umbraco.org/forum/developers/api-questions/18465-access-umbraco-content-from-wcf-service


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - Mailx and Gmail nss config dir -

-
i trying send mail linux command line using mailx command. can send local domain no problem want set mail send gmail account receive mail sent gmail account. after configuring mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore } i error: resolving host smtp.gmail.com . . . done. connecting 74.125.25.109 . . . connected. missing "nss-config-dir" variable. "/home/username/dead.letter" 11/354 . . . message not sent. after looking "nss-config-dir" here , located certn.db , keyn.db files , added mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore set nss-config-dir=/home/user/.mozilla/firefox/location.default } now when try send mail using command: echo "sent gmail account" | mailx -v -a
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more