Mercurial subrepo and relative path -

-

i have project, have bitbucket repository for, , dependent on project incorporate subrepo. now, don't have push access subrepository, nor want or need to--it's pull-only relationship.

i realize when push main repository, try push subrepositories, well. since cannot that, pulled local copy of dependent project, @ same level main repository's directory. in essence, have following layout:

main/           ; pushes https://mine.org/main   .hg/   .hgsub   lib/     subrepo/    ; clone of main/../subrepo/       .hg/  subrepo/        ; local copy of https://forbidden.org/subrepo   .hg/

the content of .hgsub like,

lib/subrepo = ../subrepo

then cloned,

~/path/to/main $ hg clone ../subrepo/ lib/subrepo

so far, good. problem is, after set , committed changes, when try push main mercurial try push subrepo https://mine.org/subrepo, not exist, thereby failing whole push operation.

is there i'm missing?

why not create https://mine.org/subrepo -- if don't want advertise can turn on hide in [web] section in .hg/hgrc file. pattern i'm used to, clone down main repo , subrepos in same layout @ each place you'll use them: both development box , web-facing hgweb install.

alternately, use [subpaths] section in main/.hg/hgrc in it:

[subpaths] https://mine.org/subrepo = https://forbidden.org/subrepo

which should let intercept derrived target push , point @ place won't let push, let see nothing has changed push can continue.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Javascript line number mapping -

-
magically formatted comments change reported line number of javascript errors in browsers; this: //@line n "f" n line number , f file name. unfortunately, //@line appears ungoogleable. know there documentation on feature, , browsers support it? (i found references here , here .) from can find available in mozilla based browsers. it using js_setoptions command can turn these options on or off depending on values passed. https://developer.mozilla.org/en/js_setoptions
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ...
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more