multithreading - ConcurrentModificationException Program in java HashMap -

-

code:

map<integer,dealcountupdater> dealcountmap=new hashmap<integer,dealcountupdater>();  public void update(){     for(map.entry<integer, dealcountupdater> e:new hashmap<integer,dealcountupdater>(dealcountmap).entryset()){//line:58         system.out.println(e.hashcode());     } }

when run code,get below exception:

java.util.concurrentmodificationexception         @ java.util.hashmap$hashiterator.nextentry(hashmap.java:793)         @ java.util.hashmap$entryiterator.next(hashmap.java:834)         @ java.util.hashmap$entryiterator.next(hashmap.java:832)         @ java.util.hashmap.putallforcreate(hashmap.java:435)         @ java.util.hashmap.<init>(hashmap.java:225)         @ org.my.tuan.count.countupdater.update(countupdater.java:58)         @ org.my.tuan._maintainer.run(tuansched.java:110)

this line countupdater.java:58 :

for(map.entry<integer, dealcountupdater> e:new hashmap<integer,dealcountupdater>(dealcountmap).entryset()){

i google program,i know can using concurrenthashmap instead of plain hashmap,

but want know ,why using :

new hashmap<integer,dealcountupdater>(dealcountmap)

to create new instance hashmap,still throw concurrentmodificationexception ?

how fix not using concurrenthashmap ?

thanks :)

the reason this:

  1. you create new hashmap(h1) passing hashmap(h2) in constructor.
  2. in constructor fo h1, tries iterate through elements of h2, add in itself.
  3. while iteration in step 2 going on, other thread modifies h2. hence concurrentmodificationexception.

how solve without using concurrenthashmap?

  1. do external synchronization
  2. use copy-n-write map described here.

but still suggest using concurrenthashmap, unless have reasons.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - Mailx and Gmail nss config dir -

-
i trying send mail linux command line using mailx command. can send local domain no problem want set mail send gmail account receive mail sent gmail account. after configuring mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore } i error: resolving host smtp.gmail.com . . . done. connecting 74.125.25.109 . . . connected. missing "nss-config-dir" variable. "/home/username/dead.letter" 11/354 . . . message not sent. after looking "nss-config-dir" here , located certn.db , keyn.db files , added mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore set nss-config-dir=/home/user/.mozilla/firefox/location.default } now when try send mail using command: echo "sent gmail account" | mailx -v -a
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more