java - Most effective way to go from Eclipse Project to Hudson Build -

-

we want use hudson/jenkins build our project realized entirely in eclipse. can tell, there various ways go b, or e h, were: export ant script, export maven script, export runnable jar while creating ant script that, etc.

all of above seem have in common between "this runs in eclipse" , "hudson produces runs" there multiple steps independent, example, can change project, commit svn , trigger hudson build, unless remember "export ant script" in between, fail.

is there "one in all" solution ? i'm not worried amount of clicks, instead various steps in between that, make matters worse, needed sometimes. in short: looking goes "i can click on 'run' button , works" "hudson produces works" without every developer having remember every optional step in between.

ideas ?

edit: of answers far seem suffer same issue: it's parallel development. have eclipse run configuration, , have maven/ant/whatever build. if change run config, have remember later change maven/ant/whatever build, commit it, , hope other developers notice change maven/ant/whatever build during daily svn update, manually open file, inspect changes , duplicate changes in own run configs. seems it's begging bugs , mistakes, isn't there that's integrated eclipse run configurations ?

hudson can build maven or ant projects, first step reproducible build either tool, need set 1 time. need take pom.xml or build.xml file , commit subversion. necessary since hudson won't open eclipse , instead use command-line execute build.

then can setup new hudson job watch subversion changes. developers can use normal workflow, use eclipse builds , commit changes source control when they're ready. hudson see , pull down fresh copy of code base, , own compile , report problems.

personally prefer maven2, since know hudson has solid integration , things run junit tests. eclipse used painful maven, there's m2eclipse plugin.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ...
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more

c++ - Warning : overflow in implicit constant conversion -

-
in following program, line 5 give overflow warning expected, surprisingly line 4 doesn't give warning in gcc: http://www.ideone.com/u0bxn int main() { int = 256; char c1 = i; //line 4 char c2 = 256; //line 5 return 0; } i thinking both lines should give overflow warning. or there i'm missing? the topic led me experiment this: typedef type checking? there said following(which deleted answer, because when run it, didn't show had expected): //however, you'll warning case: typedef int t1; typedef char t2; t1 x = 256; t2 y = x; //possible overflow warning! (but doesn't give warning :() -wall doesn't include many options. -wconversion 1 of them , warns behavior you're interested in. see http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/warning-options.html
Read more