x509certificate - FindPrivateKey under Windows 7 64 bit doesn't work -

-

i've downloaded .net sample findprivatekey, compiled framework 4.0, tried different platforms (32bit, 64bit, cpu) didn't work. same error: ordinal 345 not located in dynamic link library comctl32.dll. use windows 7 enterprise, 64 bit version. method call fails: matches = x509certificate2ui.selectfromcollection(store.certificates, "select certificate", "select certificate find location of associated private key file:", x509selectionflag.singleselection); problem here?

aleksandar

this morning i’ve encountered same problem (ordinal 345 not located ...)… i’ve tried application in 3 different pc win7 64bit; in 1 of these exception throws. found problem in use of comctl32.dll library (which different mine).

you can execute piece of code in order check version of library using:

foreach (processmodule module in system.diagnostics.process.getcurrentprocess().modules)             if (module.modulename.tolower() == "comctl32.dll")                 messagebox.show(module.fileversioninfo.tostring());

then add manifest , force application use specific library version: [project] -> add new item -> application manifest , edit adding following dependency part.

i hope works you...

    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <asmv1:assembly manifestversion="1.0" xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1" xmlns:asmv1="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1" xmlns:asmv2="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v2" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/xmlschema-instance">   <assemblyidentity version="1.0.0.0" name="myapplication.app"/>  …  …  …    <dependency>     <dependentassembly>       <assemblyidentity           type="win32"           name="microsoft.windows.common-controls"           version="6.0.0.0"           processorarchitecture="*"           publickeytoken="6595b64144ccf1df"           language="*"         />     </dependentassembly>   </dependency> </asmv1:assembly>

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Javascript line number mapping -

-
magically formatted comments change reported line number of javascript errors in browsers; this: //@line n "f" n line number , f file name. unfortunately, //@line appears ungoogleable. know there documentation on feature, , browsers support it? (i found references here , here .) from can find available in mozilla based browsers. it using js_setoptions command can turn these options on or off depending on values passed. https://developer.mozilla.org/en/js_setoptions
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ...
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more