'base' as a function parameter name in C# -

-

i following microsoft's naming guidelines, , using camelcase in function parameter naming. suppose use signature

public string writenumberinbase (int number, int base)

in method , compiler complaining parameter name because 'base' reserved keyword... there way can 'base' accepted parameter name?

try this:

public string writenumberinbase (int number, int @base) //                                               ^ //                             @ sign used "escape" keywords

(as side note, in vb.net same putting keyword or reserved word in square brackets, e.g. [mybase].)

or alternatively, call parameter radix instead of base.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ...
Read more

c++ - Warning : overflow in implicit constant conversion -

-
in following program, line 5 give overflow warning expected, surprisingly line 4 doesn't give warning in gcc: http://www.ideone.com/u0bxn int main() { int = 256; char c1 = i; //line 4 char c2 = 256; //line 5 return 0; } i thinking both lines should give overflow warning. or there i'm missing? the topic led me experiment this: typedef type checking? there said following(which deleted answer, because when run it, didn't show had expected): //however, you'll warning case: typedef int t1; typedef char t2; t1 x = 256; t2 y = x; //possible overflow warning! (but doesn't give warning :() -wall doesn't include many options. -wconversion 1 of them , warns behavior you're interested in. see http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/warning-options.html
Read more