blackberry - Add gui components from bottom up instead of top down -

-

is possible add gui components blackberry screen beginning bottom instead of top ?

thanks

a quick response no let me explain why , suggest afew work arounds;

screens don't handle laying out of fields onto themselves, delcare delegate manager can type of manager, vertical, horizontal etc. problem managers begin painting top left. manager paint fields starting bottom have know exaclty bottom located , add components rather down goes against low level code inside manager class. can read more on managers in blackberry api documentation.

you still achieve effect similar though tweaking how add fields , playing field styles. example consider code:

  add(new labelfield("field 1"));   add(new labelfield("field 2"));

this give results; 

 field 1  field 2

because field 1 drawn field 2 below it. if insert fields @ begining of our manager e.g. position 0 so:

   insert(new labelfield("field 1", field_bottom), 0);    insert(new labelfield("field 2", field_bottom), 0);

we results;

field 2 field 1

which results you'd expect screen described in question.

i'm not sure how you'd fields paint bottom of screen though, try researching "position relative bottom" styles i'm unsure.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Javascript line number mapping -

-
magically formatted comments change reported line number of javascript errors in browsers; this: //@line n "f" n line number , f file name. unfortunately, //@line appears ungoogleable. know there documentation on feature, , browsers support it? (i found references here , here .) from can find available in mozilla based browsers. it using js_setoptions command can turn these options on or off depending on values passed. https://developer.mozilla.org/en/js_setoptions
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ...
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more