subclipse - Is it safe to set SVN to ignore . in a directory that should be version controlled? -

-

yesterday, asked a question why directories can appear subclipse contain uncommitted changes when don't. answer setting svn:ignore status on pseudo-directory . counted modification, subclipse didn't show because doesn't deal ..

knowing cause nice, issue isn't resolved. safe commit addition of ignore status . pseudo-directory? not want actual directory ignored svn; want make uncommitted change decorator go away. (no, haven't tried doing it. wouldn't know how cleanly revert change if turned out problematic.)

edit:
pointed out in tim's answer, blaming modification of . misleading. . marked modified because 1 of subdirectories set svn:ignore; that's real change , root cause.

based on output of svn diff received, setting svn:ignore resource target. property information saved on parent versioned resource (in case project root .) can committed repository independent of local ignore settings.

given this, safe commit property change? depends on impact want make. documentation makes note svn:ignore property:

the svn:ignore property way tell subversion ignore files present in every user's working copy of directory, such compiler output...

so, committing change, you'd effective ignore target resource pulled project repository (provided it's unversioned). it's possible may not policy @ workplace though, may want avoid this. remove property, can take 1 of following actions:

  • run svn propdel svn:ignore . command line
  • in eclipse (with subclipse), right-click project folder, go team -> show properties, select svn:ignore property entry, right-click, , click delete property

this should rid of modification notice on root directory. respect previous question, problem have been more apparent had not been fact property changes show normal outgoing changes in synchronization view. if bring commit dialog, should see distinct property change decorator.

unfortunately, leaves target resource unignored. fix in eclipse, can add target list of ignored resources. option, go window -> preferences -> team -> ignored resources. can add "target" list of ignore patterns. if wish apply ignore pattern subversion globally, can modify global-ignores setting of subversion configuration file.

the problem approach ignores target resource projects in eclipse workspace, or subversion actions across system (depending on ignore method of choice). @ moment, can't think of way reverse on case-by-case basis.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Javascript line number mapping -

-
magically formatted comments change reported line number of javascript errors in browsers; this: //@line n "f" n line number , f file name. unfortunately, //@line appears ungoogleable. know there documentation on feature, , browsers support it? (i found references here , here .) from can find available in mozilla based browsers. it using js_setoptions command can turn these options on or off depending on values passed. https://developer.mozilla.org/en/js_setoptions
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ...
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more