c# - Strange behavior of Array.Clone() -

-

i have static array below

static byte[] myarray = {0x01,0x02};

i read array.clone shallow copy.then execute below codes.

byte[] myarray2 = myarray.clone() byte[]; myarray2[0] = 0x05;

but each myarray2[0] , myarray[0] contains different values.so think array.clone() performing deep copy .can explain why?

byte primitive type, not reference. there no difference between shallow , deep copy in case.

try using array of mutable object type, , notice difference.

update

but byte[] reference type right?

an array of primitive type deep down represented contiguous block of memory, physically (by value) containing elements. whereas array of object type contiguous block of memory, containing references actual elements (or nulls). when copy array, in first case new array containing copies of elements of original. after that, modifying element in either of arrays won't change contents of other array. whereas in second case new array containing copies of references in original, still pointing same objects referred original array elements. if modify of elements in either of array, change visible in other array too.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Javascript line number mapping -

-
magically formatted comments change reported line number of javascript errors in browsers; this: //@line n "f" n line number , f file name. unfortunately, //@line appears ungoogleable. know there documentation on feature, , browsers support it? (i found references here , here .) from can find available in mozilla based browsers. it using js_setoptions command can turn these options on or off depending on values passed. https://developer.mozilla.org/en/js_setoptions
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ...
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more