Generic types in Java -

-

is right code

list<integer> test2 = new arraylist<integer>(); test2.add(343); int x2 = test2.get(0);

in compile time converted this

list test = new arraylist(); test.add(343); int x = (integer)test.get(0);

something similar autoboxing...

let's try. take class 2 methods absolutely same thing , without generics , autoboxing:

public class generictest{      // use generics , auto-boxing     // java 1.5 or higher required     public void generic(){         final list<integer> test2 = new arraylist<integer>();         test2.add(343);         final int x2 = test2.get(0);     }      // use neither generics nor auto-boxing,     // should java 1.4-compatible     public void nongeneric(){         final list test2 = new arraylist();         test2.add(integer.valueof(343));         final int x2 = ((integer) test2.get(0)).intvalue();     } }

here's byte code:

// compiled generictest.java (version 1.6 : 50.0, super bit) public class generictest {    // method descriptor #6 ()v   // stack: 1, locals: 1   public generictest();     0  aload_0 [this]     1  invokespecial java.lang.object() [8]     4  return       line numbers:         [pc: 0, line: 4]       local variable table:         [pc: 0, pc: 5] local: index: 0 type: generictest    // method descriptor #6 ()v   // stack: 2, locals: 3   public void generic();      0  new java.util.arraylist [16]      3  dup      4  invokespecial java.util.arraylist() [18]      7  astore_1 [test2]      8  aload_1 [test2]      9  sipush 343     12  invokestatic java.lang.integer.valueof(int) : java.lang.integer [19]     15  invokeinterface java.util.list.add(java.lang.object) : boolean [25] [nargs: 2]     20  pop     21  aload_1 [test2]     22  iconst_0     23  invokeinterface java.util.list.get(int) : java.lang.object [31] [nargs: 2]     28  checkcast java.lang.integer [20]     31  invokevirtual java.lang.integer.intvalue() : int [35]     34  istore_2 [x2]     35  return       line numbers:         [pc: 0, line: 7]         [pc: 8, line: 8]         [pc: 21, line: 9]         [pc: 35, line: 10]       local variable table:         [pc: 0, pc: 36] local: index: 0 type: generictest         [pc: 8, pc: 36] local: test2 index: 1 type: java.util.list         [pc: 35, pc: 36] local: x2 index: 2 type: int       local variable type table:         [pc: 8, pc: 36] local: test2 index: 1 type: java.util.list<java.lang.integer>    // method descriptor #6 ()v   // stack: 2, locals: 3   public void nongeneric();      0  new java.util.arraylist [16]      3  dup      4  invokespecial java.util.arraylist() [18]      7  astore_1 [test2]      8  aload_1 [test2]      9  sipush 343     12  invokestatic java.lang.integer.valueof(int) : java.lang.integer [19]     15  invokeinterface java.util.list.add(java.lang.object) : boolean [25] [nargs: 2]     20  pop     21  aload_1 [test2]     22  iconst_0     23  invokeinterface java.util.list.get(int) : java.lang.object [31] [nargs: 2]     28  checkcast java.lang.integer [20]     31  invokevirtual java.lang.integer.intvalue() : int [35]     34  istore_2 [x2]     35  return       line numbers:         [pc: 0, line: 13]         [pc: 8, line: 14]         [pc: 21, line: 15]         [pc: 35, line: 16]       local variable table:         [pc: 0, pc: 36] local: index: 0 type: generictest         [pc: 8, pc: 36] local: test2 index: 1 type: java.util.list         [pc: 35, pc: 36] local: x2 index: 2 type: int }

i don't see obvious difference between generic , non-generic version, in fact here's diff result 2 methods:

<  public void generic(); --- >   public void nongeneric(); 19,22c19,22 <         [pc: 0, line: 7] <         [pc: 8, line: 8] <         [pc: 21, line: 9] <         [pc: 35, line: 10] --- >         [pc: 0, line: 13] >         [pc: 8, line: 14] >         [pc: 21, line: 15] >         [pc: 35, line: 16] 27,28d26 <       local variable type table: <         [pc: 8, pc: 36] local: test2 index: 1 type: java.util.list<java.lang.integer>

as can see, difference in line numbers , local variable table.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Javascript line number mapping -

-
magically formatted comments change reported line number of javascript errors in browsers; this: //@line n "f" n line number , f file name. unfortunately, //@line appears ungoogleable. know there documentation on feature, , browsers support it? (i found references here , here .) from can find available in mozilla based browsers. it using js_setoptions command can turn these options on or off depending on values passed. https://developer.mozilla.org/en/js_setoptions
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ...
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more