asp.net - Uploading Large files to YouTube API (.NET) -

-

i trying upload videos youtube api... it's working fine if video file < 4 mb..

below code.. think issue related request length?!

update: error getting "cannot close stream until bytes written."

upload code

youtuberequestsettings settings = new youtuberequestsettings("app name", "developerkey", "username", "password");         youtuberequest request = new youtuberequest(settings);          request.settings.timeout = 9999999;          video newvideo = new video();          newvideo.title = "movie size 3 mb";         newvideo.tags.add(new mediacategory("autos", youtubenametable.categoryschema));         newvideo.keywords = "cars, funny";         newvideo.description = "my description";         newvideo.youtubeentry.private = false;         newvideo.tags.add(new mediacategory("mydevtag, anotherdevtag", youtubenametable.developertagschema));          string videopath = "c:\\1.flv";          newvideo.youtubeentry.mediasource = new mediafilesource(videopath, getcontenttype(videopath));         video createdvideo = request.upload(newvideo);          litmessage.text = "video " + newvideo.title + " uploaded.";

web.config

<httpruntime     executiontimeout="240"     maxrequestlength="40960"     requestlengthdiskthreshold="80"     usefullyqualifiedredirecturl="false"     minfreethreads="8"     minlocalrequestfreethreads="4"     apprequestqueuelimit="5000"     enablekerneloutputcache="true"     enableversionheader="true"     requirerootedsaveaspath="true"     enable="true"     shutdowntimeout="90"     delaynotificationtimeout="5"     waitchangenotification="0"     maxwaitchangenotification="0"     enableheaderchecking="true"     sendcachecontrolheader="true"     apartmentthreading="false" />

i don't think it's request length. afaik use when receiving uploaded file. seems me there's timeout somewhere. raise timeout value in both code , httpruntime portion of web.config , see if works.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - Mailx and Gmail nss config dir -

-
i trying send mail linux command line using mailx command. can send local domain no problem want set mail send gmail account receive mail sent gmail account. after configuring mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore } i error: resolving host smtp.gmail.com . . . done. connecting 74.125.25.109 . . . connected. missing "nss-config-dir" variable. "/home/username/dead.letter" 11/354 . . . message not sent. after looking "nss-config-dir" here , located certn.db , keyn.db files , added mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore set nss-config-dir=/home/user/.mozilla/firefox/location.default } now when try send mail using command: echo "sent gmail account" | mailx -v -a
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more