javascript - Large contents within container size -

-

this first post, please bear me. went through many posts , couldn't find solution. (i came across similar problem in this post , can't related exact situation).

issue: have display large data table (with more 30 columns) on screen. challenge - client doesn't horizontal scroll bar of mean.

i thinking of splitting table pieces , using simple sliders jquery: "serialscroll" or "contentslider". however, here challenge: 508 compliance, table needs single table instead of splitting multiple table in different slides.

i visioning need "view finder" div on top of "large table" control shift table size of div left , right, http://img202.imageshack.us/i/tableviewfinderidea.jpg/.

my question is:

  • is there js or jquery solution out there doing this? (i searched 2 weeks without luck.)

  • is there other recommendation?

thanks lot.

using container div styled 'overflow:hidden' allows masking shown in graphic. it's easy move masked content setting 'position:absolute' , tweaking 'left' value.

i put short example of online @ http://jsfiddle.net/bdzpj/

only thing is, have know height of content being scrolled, have set height mask too. read height table on document.ready though, , apply container initially.

anyway, 'pointy' says in comment above, using standard scrollbar surely best way - client has move, too.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Javascript line number mapping -

-
magically formatted comments change reported line number of javascript errors in browsers; this: //@line n "f" n line number , f file name. unfortunately, //@line appears ungoogleable. know there documentation on feature, , browsers support it? (i found references here , here .) from can find available in mozilla based browsers. it using js_setoptions command can turn these options on or off depending on values passed. https://developer.mozilla.org/en/js_setoptions
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ...
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more