c# - What's the best (easy&efficient) solution for asp.net developers to develop a mobile version of their existing website -

-

i hope question self-describing.

i'm developing asp.net website uses ms sqlserver database in data layer.

and thinking options mobile version (most importantly supports blackberry , iphone , every mobile device!) , when used on blackberry want able let run @ bb's background.

i thinking asp.net mobile controls projects page seems dead/not-updated framework , not sure if supports windows mobiles or what!

edit thank questions, covered problem 1 respective .. mean how going let me use blackberry appliction options letting website run @ device background or sending notifications users!

if use asp.net mvc create app , create regular , mobile views. can use jquery mobile mobile views too.

this question covers how change view based on device type,

if use webforms, can change masterpage depending on browser giving ability swap mobile versions more easily:

protected void page_preinit(object sender, eventargs e) {     if (request.browser.ismobiledevice)         masterpagefile = "~/mobile.master"; }

or use global.asax redirect mobile requests completely:

void session_start(object sender, eventargs e) {     // redirect mobile users mobile home page     httprequest httprequest = httpcontext.current.request;     if (httprequest.browser.ismobiledevice)     {         string path = httprequest.url.pathandquery;         bool isonmobilepage = path.startswith("/mobile/",                                 stringcomparison.ordinalignorecase);         if (!isonmobilepage)         {             string redirectto = "~/mobile/";              // add special logic redirect              // recognized pages mobile equivalents of              // pages (where exist). example,             // if (httpcontext.current.handler userregistration)             //     redirectto = "~/mobile/register.aspx";              httpcontext.current.response.redirect(redirectto);         }     } }

either way read article: http://www.asp.net/learn/whitepapers/add-mobile-pages-to-your-aspnet-web-forms-mvc-application


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - Mailx and Gmail nss config dir -

-
i trying send mail linux command line using mailx command. can send local domain no problem want set mail send gmail account receive mail sent gmail account. after configuring mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore } i error: resolving host smtp.gmail.com . . . done. connecting 74.125.25.109 . . . connected. missing "nss-config-dir" variable. "/home/username/dead.letter" 11/354 . . . message not sent. after looking "nss-config-dir" here , located certn.db , keyn.db files , added mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore set nss-config-dir=/home/user/.mozilla/firefox/location.default } now when try send mail using command: echo "sent gmail account" | mailx -v -a
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more