templates - Variadic functions (without arguments!) -

-

let's assume want in c++0x:

size_t count_int() { return 0; } template<typename t, typename... tn> size_t count_int(t a0, tn... an) {     size_t n = is_integer<t>::value ? 1 : 0;     return n + count_int(an...); }

nice, feels unnecessary pass around arguments. unfortunately, not work:

size_t count_int() { return 0; } template<typename t, typename... tn> size_t count_int() {     size_t n = is_integer<t>::value ? 1 : 0;     return n + count_int<tn...>(); }

gcc complains error: no matching function call 'count_int()' in next-to-last line. why , how can fixed? thanks.

this works:

template <typename t> size_t count_int() {    return is_integer<t>::value ? 1 : 0; }  template<typename t, typename t1, typename... tn> size_t count_int() {     size_t n = is_integer<t>::value ? 1 : 0;     return n + count_int<t1,tn...>(); };

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ...
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more