c# - Map many to many relation in entity framework -

-

i have sql server database , c# win forms application , using entity framework.

in database have following tables :

table joint(       jointid       firstname       fathername       lastname)

which represent joint in gym , every joint has closet, , every joint has 1 closet , each closet can rent 1 joint. thought 1 one relation don't know if it's true anyway closet table :

table closet(    closetid    number)

but @ same time want keep history each closet because maybe rent 2 months , else rent same closet after first 1 want know each joint rent closet, , want know own know , how payed rent of closet, want start time, end time, price.

at last figured out want third table between above tables , many many relation created :

table closethistory(    jointid     fk    closetid    fk    starttime    endtime    price)

and think right not sure , not problem. problem when update entities database relation between joint , closet not created , create joint entity stand alone , closet entity doesn't contain starttime, endtime, price attributes, , closethistory not created , true because table between tow tables in many many relation not represented entity, if remove startdate , enddate, price fields closethistory table , re pdate entities works , relation created can't save starttime , endtime , price closets

can me please ??

and sorry explanation, , sorry english language know it's bad :)

you can use 4 table scheme , pair of insert , delete triggers resolve issue.enter image description here

create trigger [dbo].[addtrigger]    on [dbo].[closetjoint]    after insert  begin     set nocount on;     declare @jointid int;     declare @closetid int;      set @closetid = (select closetid inserted);     set @jointid = (select jointid inserted);      insert closethistory(closetid, jointid, starttime)      values(@closetid, @jointid, getdate()) end  create trigger [dbo].[deletetrigger]    on [dbo].[closetjoint]    after delete  begin     set nocount on;     declare @jointid int;     declare @closetid int;      set @closetid = (select closetid deleted);     set @jointid = (select jointid deleted);      update closethistory set endtime = getdate()     closetid = @closetid , jointid = @jointid , endtime null end

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Javascript line number mapping -

-
magically formatted comments change reported line number of javascript errors in browsers; this: //@line n "f" n line number , f file name. unfortunately, //@line appears ungoogleable. know there documentation on feature, , browsers support it? (i found references here , here .) from can find available in mozilla based browsers. it using js_setoptions command can turn these options on or off depending on values passed. https://developer.mozilla.org/en/js_setoptions
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ...
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more