Structure for big GWT project -

-

context

  • big project multi maven module or single maven module structure

question

  • did use multi-maven-module or single-maven-module structure?

details

if you've worked on big project had long development duration , contains lots of functionality(i.e. not trivial project), did choose split project multiple maven modules or went single-module approach?

for example, having multi-module structure, crashes when running maven commands mvn gwt:eclipse(see http://bit.ly/gs4rmo). guess have worked single module gwt project. , there other commands above has issues multi-module structure.

however, multi-module structure bring benefits of faster development, i.e. if separate "server" "client" module, compile business logic(server) separately , package resulting web archive. compiling gwt code, takes 20 seconds, if modify server package, save lots of time in long run.

which other cases 1 above did encounter when working multi-module/single module project?

thank you!

a few notes:

  1. on development server don't have compile code "by hand": dev server compiles code automatically , reloads it. keep dev server running, change code , reload page in browser. (this true if change existing classes , don't change project structure)

  2. multiple maven modules have nothing multiple gwt modules.

  3. you want have multiple gwt modules (= multiple entry points) if have code executes in different environments: example have web , mobile sites have quite different code bases. split project 3 modules: web, mobile , common. you'd reference common in both web , mobile.

  4. another case multiple gwt modules if you, reason, want have multiple host (entry) html pages. there rare cases when you'd want this, example when need redirects when integrating openid. other case have existing web pages adding gwt add functionality.

  5. don't split gwt project multiple modules reduce download size: use code splitting instead.

  6. if main gripe long gwt compile times read: how speed gwt compiler?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - Mailx and Gmail nss config dir -

-
i trying send mail linux command line using mailx command. can send local domain no problem want set mail send gmail account receive mail sent gmail account. after configuring mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore } i error: resolving host smtp.gmail.com . . . done. connecting 74.125.25.109 . . . connected. missing "nss-config-dir" variable. "/home/username/dead.letter" 11/354 . . . message not sent. after looking "nss-config-dir" here , located certn.db , keyn.db files , added mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore set nss-config-dir=/home/user/.mozilla/firefox/location.default } now when try send mail using command: echo "sent gmail account" | mailx -v -a
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more