Trying to parse JSON file with jQuery -

-

i trying parse json file exact stucture in following.

{     "students": {         "student": [             {                 "id": 1,                 "name": "john doe",                 "image": "pic1.jpg",                 "homepage": "http: //www.google.com"             },             {                 "id": 2,                 "name": "jane doe",                 "image": "pic1.jpg",                 "homepage": "http: //www.google.com"             }         ]     } }

i using following jquery function:

function getstudents(filename) {     $.getjson(filename, function(data){         $.each(data.student, function(i,s){             var id = s.id;;             var name = s.name;;             var img = s.image;;             var homepage = s.homepage;             $('.networktable').append('<tr><td><img src="' + img + '" class="piceven pic" width="33" height="35"></td><td><a href="'+ homepage + '" class="networklink">' + name + '</a></td></tr>');         });     }); }

is there doing wrong?

you not accessing correct element. data not point students, points outer element {students:...} (students property of it). array contained in data.students.student:

$.each(data.students.student, function() {     //... });

further notes:

  • you don't need create local variable if access property once (but of course might more readable).

  • while having consecutive semicolons ;; not wrong, unnecessary , confusing (at least confuses me ;))


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Javascript line number mapping -

-
magically formatted comments change reported line number of javascript errors in browsers; this: //@line n "f" n line number , f file name. unfortunately, //@line appears ungoogleable. know there documentation on feature, , browsers support it? (i found references here , here .) from can find available in mozilla based browsers. it using js_setoptions command can turn these options on or off depending on values passed. https://developer.mozilla.org/en/js_setoptions
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ...
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more