Automatically grab file path -

-

everyone looking way automatically upload file skip browse , choose file process.

so set location of file somehow via form , client has click submit , automatcially upload file path have set. skipping browse file process.

i intergrate following undesigns s3 class

http://undesigned.org.za/2007/10/22/amazon-s3-php-class/documentation

<?php      s3::setauth(awsaccesskey, awssecretkey);      $bucket = "upload-bucket";     $path = "myfiles/"; // can empty ""      $lifetime = 3600; // period parameters valid     $maxfilesize = (1024 * 1024 * 50); // 50 mb      $metaheaders = array("uid" => 123);     $requestheaders = array(         "content-type" => "application/octet-stream",         "content-disposition" => 'attachment; filename=${filename}'     );      $params = s3::gethttpuploadpostparams(         $bucket,         $path,         s3::acl_public_read,         $lifetime,         $maxfilesize,         201, // or url redirect on success         $metaheaders,         $requestheaders,         false // false since we're not using flash     );      $uploadurl = "https://{$bucket}.s3.amazonaws.com/";  ?><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd xhtml 1.0 strict//en" "http://www.w3.org/tr/xhtml1/dtd/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <head>     <title>s3 form upload</title> </head> <body>     <form method="post" action="<?php echo $uploadurl; ?>" enctype="multipart/form-data"> <?php     foreach ($params $p => $v)         echo "        <input type=\"hidden\" name=\"{$p}\" value=\"{$v}\" />\n"; ?>         <input type="file" name="file" />&#160;<input type="submit" value="upload" />     </form> </body> </html>

at point grab file path ?

is grabbing out of name here

can $_files ???

can please give me point on start appriciate this.

thanks

you'll have specify tools of trade. common html form has no such functionality.

you can try value="c:\somefile.ext" many browsers not accept this.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - Mailx and Gmail nss config dir -

-
i trying send mail linux command line using mailx command. can send local domain no problem want set mail send gmail account receive mail sent gmail account. after configuring mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore } i error: resolving host smtp.gmail.com . . . done. connecting 74.125.25.109 . . . connected. missing "nss-config-dir" variable. "/home/username/dead.letter" 11/354 . . . message not sent. after looking "nss-config-dir" here , located certn.db , keyn.db files , added mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore set nss-config-dir=/home/user/.mozilla/firefox/location.default } now when try send mail using command: echo "sent gmail account" | mailx -v -a
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more