Android build works in Eclipse but not with Ant ("already added") -

-

my android project uses several git submodules marked android libraries. these submodules have different uses of ormlite android jars , have ormlite jars included in libs directory. eclipse handles situation correctly: includes ormlite jars once during dex processing , generates valid .apk, when run build via ant debug, get:

 [echo] converting compiled files , external libraries /home/webedit/.hudson/jobs/xyz/workspace/bin/classes.dex... [apply]  [apply] unexpected top-level exception: [apply] java.lang.illegalargumentexception: added: lcom/j256/ormlite/android/androidcompiledstatement; [apply]     @ com.android.dx.dex.file.classdefssection.add(classdefssection.java:123) [apply]     @ com.android.dx.dex.file.dexfile.add(dexfile.java:143) [apply]     @ com.android.dx.command.dexer.main.processclass(main.java:338) [apply]     @ com.android.dx.command.dexer.main.processfilebytes(main.java:315) [apply]     @ com.android.dx.command.dexer.main.access$100(main.java:56) [apply]     @ com.android.dx.command.dexer.main$1.processfilebytes(main.java:266) [apply]     @ com.android.dx.cf.direct.classpathopener.processarchive(classpathopener.java:244) [apply]     @ com.android.dx.cf.direct.classpathopener.processone(classpathopener.java:130) [apply]     @ com.android.dx.cf.direct.classpathopener.process(classpathopener.java:108) [apply]     @ com.android.dx.command.dexer.main.processone(main.java:284) [apply]     @ com.android.dx.command.dexer.main.processallfiles(main.java:220) [apply]     @ com.android.dx.command.dexer.main.run(main.java:176) [apply]     @ com.android.dx.command.dexer.main.main(main.java:157) [apply]     @ com.android.dx.command.main.main(main.java:89)

is there way have multiple copies of same jar sprinkled across multiple libraries? there ant build setting can change work?

i got same problem using maven because correctly added ormlite-core-jarfile, contains packages , classes core-jar few additional classes.

i added exclusion , works

            <dependency>                 <groupid>com.j256.ormlite</groupid>                 <artifactid>ormlite-android</artifactid>                 <version>4.9</version>                 <exclusions>                     <exclusion>                         <groupid>com.j256.ormlite</groupid>                         <artifactid>ormlite-core</artifactid>                     </exclusion>                 </exclusions>             </dependency>

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Javascript line number mapping -

-
magically formatted comments change reported line number of javascript errors in browsers; this: //@line n "f" n line number , f file name. unfortunately, //@line appears ungoogleable. know there documentation on feature, , browsers support it? (i found references here , here .) from can find available in mozilla based browsers. it using js_setoptions command can turn these options on or off depending on values passed. https://developer.mozilla.org/en/js_setoptions
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ...
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more