ruby - How can fixtures be replaced with factories using rails3-generators? -

-

i'm trying replace fixture generation factories using rails3-generators:

https://github.com/indirect/rails3-generators#readme

the gem included in gemfile , has been installed:

# gemfile gem 'rails3-generators', :group => :development

i added following application.rb:

# application.rb config.generators |g|   g.stylesheets false   g.fixture_replacement :factory_girl end

yet 'rails g model insect' still generating fixtures ('insects.yml'). working others using rails 3.0.4 , rails3-generators 0.17.4?

'rails g' shows new generators available (such authlogic , koala), 'rails g model' still lists fixtures , doesn't refer factories.

what else should add work? thanks.

edit: ran gem's test suite, includes test this, , passes. no clue why doesn't work app.

edit2: tried again test project , same result: fixtures instead of factories. if confirm whether works them rails 3.0.4 , rails3-generators 0.17.4, helpful because imply i'm doing wrong projects.

edit3: works if run 'rails g model insect -r factory_girl'. thought generator configuration in application.rb supposed take care of that, seems source of problem.

searching around found following, may help:

  1. try specifying directory option factory_girl's factories:

    config.generators |g|   g.stylesheets false   g.fixture_replacement :factory_girl, :dir => "spec/factories" # or test/factories, case may end

  2. if you're using test::unit, try following:

    config.generators |g|   g.stylesheets false   g.test_framework  :test_unit, :fixture_replacement => :factory_girl end

in both cases still need rails3-generators gem, although there push functionality factory_girl_rails.

this rails bug indicates that, @ point, g.fixture_replacement code may not have worked right. perhaps test in 3.0.5 in order. :)


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - Mailx and Gmail nss config dir -

-
i trying send mail linux command line using mailx command. can send local domain no problem want set mail send gmail account receive mail sent gmail account. after configuring mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore } i error: resolving host smtp.gmail.com . . . done. connecting 74.125.25.109 . . . connected. missing "nss-config-dir" variable. "/home/username/dead.letter" 11/354 . . . message not sent. after looking "nss-config-dir" here , located certn.db , keyn.db files , added mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore set nss-config-dir=/home/user/.mozilla/firefox/location.default } now when try send mail using command: echo "sent gmail account" | mailx -v -a
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more