caching - Django: Cached items not accessible between processes? -

-

i have problems using django cache. looks cached items not readable between processes. design? haven't found information on it.

testing on production server using 2 ssh sessions in parallel, , setting cache in 1 , reading in other using memcache backend (also tested file based backend), , result:

(session 1):

>>> django.core.cache import cache >>> cache.set('foo','bar') >>> cache.get('foo') 'bar'

(session 2):

>>> django.core.cache import cache >>> cache.get('foo', 0) #cache has not been set yet... 0 >>> cache.get('foo', 0) #cache has been set in other session, expect 'bar' here 0

i use low level cache api cache processed results of uploaded file. user complete more steps describe uploaded data @ point it's entered in db. done asynchronously using apache2 1 thread per process, mod_wsgi , python 2.5. problem ran in "cache.get('<filekey>')" returns none when test , upload file.

thanks

django's cache system abstraction layer several different cache backends. although allows interact them using same api behave differently depending on 1 have configured. see documentation full details.

you configure backend use using cache_backend setting in settings.py file. if don't set setting you'll simple, in-process, cache explain why you're not able access cache values set in other processes. suggest @ memcached , use backend. it's fast, scalable , easy configure.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Javascript line number mapping -

-
magically formatted comments change reported line number of javascript errors in browsers; this: //@line n "f" n line number , f file name. unfortunately, //@line appears ungoogleable. know there documentation on feature, , browsers support it? (i found references here , here .) from can find available in mozilla based browsers. it using js_setoptions command can turn these options on or off depending on values passed. https://developer.mozilla.org/en/js_setoptions
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ...
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more