android - Updating appWidget gives Problem loading gadget -

-

i'm trying add view main remoteviews keep getting problem loading gadget error. here's xmls , code, appreciated.

public class widgetprovider extends appwidgetprovider {   @override public void onupdate(context context, appwidgetmanager appwidgetmanager,         int[] appwidgetids) {     componentname thiswidget = new componentname(context, widgetprovider.class);     remoteviews updateviews = new remoteviews(context.getpackagename(), r.layout.widget_main);     remoteviews bookmark = new remoteviews(context.getpackagename(), r.layout.widget_items);     updateviews.addview(r.id.view_container,  bookmark);      appwidgetmanager.updateappwidget(thiswidget, updateviews);  }

}

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <linearlayout     xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"     android:id="@+id/relativelayout_widget"     android:layout_width="fill_parent"     android:layout_height="fill_parent"     android:background="@drawable/widget_4x4_portrait" > 

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <linearlayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"     android:layout_width="fill_parent"     android:layout_height="wrap_content">     <linearlayout         android:id="@+id/view_container"         android:layout_width="fill_parent"         android:layout_height="wrap_content">         <!-- new views added here @ runtime -->     </linearlayout> </linearlayout>

note 2.1 has bug

appwidgetmanager.updateappwidget(int id, remoteviews rv)

does not work, must use

appwidgetmanager.updateappwidget(int [] ids, remoteview rv).

i made unit length array particular widget id element.

weirdly, both methods work in 1.6, 2.0, 2.2 , 2.3.

just pointer else stuck non updating appwidgets.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Javascript line number mapping -

-
magically formatted comments change reported line number of javascript errors in browsers; this: //@line n "f" n line number , f file name. unfortunately, //@line appears ungoogleable. know there documentation on feature, , browsers support it? (i found references here , here .) from can find available in mozilla based browsers. it using js_setoptions command can turn these options on or off depending on values passed. https://developer.mozilla.org/en/js_setoptions
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ...
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more