jquery - reLayout items with isotope, doesn't seem to maintain structure -

-

i've been playing isotope bit http://isotope.metafizzy.co/demos/relayout.html , have been trying create parent container remains fixed size, having 6 smaller items, , reshuffling fit 7th larger item.

here have far on jsfiddle http://jsfiddle.net/pedalpete/lgbg6/

what hoping happen after clicking on block, total number of smaller blocks in 1 row 3.

for reason, either user .isotope('resize'), or resorting , recreating isotope i'm doing, end number greater 3 in top row, items not sorted evenly.

i have thought arrangement static after resorting. there way have isotope obey width , height parameters of binding box??

see http://jsfiddle.net/desandro/s5vag/ solution.

is there way have isotope obey width , height parameters of binding box??

the first step disable isotope resizing container. set resizescontainer option false.

now accomplish fitting blocks container, there several ways this. build own layoutmode, or try playing around sorting. solution employed.

i used different layoutmode, fitcolumns, think better suits you're going for. using getsortdata parameter, logic if item has class of large , item, gets pushed next column. 2, 4, 6 placed in next column when big.

getsortdata : {   fitorder : function( $item ) {     var order,         index = $item.index();      if ( $item.hasclass('large') && index % 2 ) {       order = index + 1.5;     } else {       order = index;     }     return order;   } },

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Javascript line number mapping -

-
magically formatted comments change reported line number of javascript errors in browsers; this: //@line n "f" n line number , f file name. unfortunately, //@line appears ungoogleable. know there documentation on feature, , browsers support it? (i found references here , here .) from can find available in mozilla based browsers. it using js_setoptions command can turn these options on or off depending on values passed. https://developer.mozilla.org/en/js_setoptions
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ...
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more