css - Problem with position absolute in ie7, div moves 10px to the right -

-

ive got problem on position absolute property on ie7. div moves 10px right. below code. ie8 , 9 works fine. id menu div im referring.

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd xhtml 1.0 transitional//en" "http://www.w3.org/tr/xhtml1/dtd/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <style type="text/css"> body{margin: 0 0 0 0; padding: 0 0 0 0;} #holder{width: 400px; height: 500px; margin: 0 auto;} #left{float: left; width: 50px; height: 500px; background-color: red;} #center{float: left; width: 300px; height: 500px; background-color: green;} #right{float: left; width: 50px; height: 500px; background-color: red;} #header{width: 300px; height: 70px; background-color: yellow;} #gal-holder{width: 280px; height: 70px; margin: 0 auto;} #gallery{width: 280px; height: 410px; background-color: orange;} #button{width: 400px; height: 45px; background-color: red; margin: 0 auto;} #menu{width: 300px; height: 45px; background-color: pink; position: absolute; z-index: 1000; top: 100px;} #content{width: 380px; height: 200px; margin: 0 auto; background-color: blue; padding: 10px; color: #fff;} #clear{height: 10px;} </style> </head> <body> <div id="holder">     <div id="left"></div>     <div id="center">         <div id="header"></div>         <div id="menu"></div>         <div id="gal-holder">             <div id="clear"></div>             <div id="gallery"></div>             <div id="clear"></div>         </div>     </div>     <div id="right"></div> </div> <div id="button"></div> <div id="content">sample text</div> </body> </html>

add position:relative #center , left:0px #menu.

absolutely positioned elements positioned relative closest positioned parent. it's best give items want position left/right , top/bottom coordinate prevent weird results 1 found.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - Mailx and Gmail nss config dir -

-
i trying send mail linux command line using mailx command. can send local domain no problem want set mail send gmail account receive mail sent gmail account. after configuring mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore } i error: resolving host smtp.gmail.com . . . done. connecting 74.125.25.109 . . . connected. missing "nss-config-dir" variable. "/home/username/dead.letter" 11/354 . . . message not sent. after looking "nss-config-dir" here , located certn.db , keyn.db files , added mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore set nss-config-dir=/home/user/.mozilla/firefox/location.default } now when try send mail using command: echo "sent gmail account" | mailx -v -a
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more