c++ - Simultaneous abort() in two threads -

-

i have backtrace haven't seen before. see frame 2 in these threads:

thread 31 (process 8752): #0  0x00faa410 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1  0x00b0b139 in sigprocmask () /lib/libc.so.6 #2  0x00b0c7a2 in abort () /lib/libc.so.6 #3  0x00752aa0 in __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler () /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 #4  0x00750505 in ?? () /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 #5  0x00750542 in std::terminate () /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 #6  0x00750c65 in __cxa_pure_virtual () /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 #7  0x00299c63 in applicationfunction()  thread 1 (process 8749): #0  0x00faa410 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1  0x00b0ad80 in raise () /lib/libc.so.6 #2  0x00b0c691 in abort () /lib/libc.so.6 #3  0x00b4324b in __libc_message () /lib/libc.so.6 #4  0x00b495b6 in malloc_consolidate () /lib/libc.so.6 #5  0x00b4b3bd in _int_malloc () /lib/libc.so.6 #6  0x00b4d3ab in malloc () /lib/libc.so.6 #7  0x08147f03 in anotherapplicationfunction ()

when opening gdb , getting backtrace gives me thread 1. later saw weird state thread 31 in. thread library had problems i'd believe crash caused it.

so mean? 2 threads simultaneously doing illegal? or it's 1 of them, causing somehow abort() in other one?

the os linux red hat enterprise 5.3, it's multiprocessor server.

looks heap corruption, detected malloc in thread 1, causing or caused error in thread 31.

some broken piece of code overwriting a.o. vtable in thread 31 cause this.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - Mailx and Gmail nss config dir -

-
i trying send mail linux command line using mailx command. can send local domain no problem want set mail send gmail account receive mail sent gmail account. after configuring mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore } i error: resolving host smtp.gmail.com . . . done. connecting 74.125.25.109 . . . connected. missing "nss-config-dir" variable. "/home/username/dead.letter" 11/354 . . . message not sent. after looking "nss-config-dir" here , located certn.db , keyn.db files , added mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore set nss-config-dir=/home/user/.mozilla/firefox/location.default } now when try send mail using command: echo "sent gmail account" | mailx -v -a
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more