Are Java and C# as "customizable" as Python? -

-

at time of asking, using python of time, , have not used java or c# much, although have (basic) idea of how work. thinking possibly start use java or c# more, seems little know them aren't "customizable" python, may wrong.

by "customizable" (there better phrases use describe mean, can't think of better :-) ), mean things in python like:

  • dynamic object attributes definition (using __getattr__, etc.)
  • import hooks (so code modules can imported type of media, not files match sets of criteria)(see pep 302 -- new import hooks, , this stackoverflow question)
  • operator overloading (i think c# , java both have this, example)
  • subclassing of built in types
  • mappings , sequence simulation using __getitem__, __setitem__, , __delitem__, etc., "magic" methods

so, wondering if there (at least of) these "customization" kinds of things in java , c#, , if not, there functionally similar or equivalent ways these kinds of things?

python being dynamic language going have advantage here on more static languages c# , java. java , c# have traditionally targeted more conservative markets, making them more conservative design. although c# gains more , more dynamic oriented features each new release. 

dynamic object attributes definition (using __getattr__, etc.)

this can accomplished in c# 4.0 using new dynamic support. idynamicobject it's possible implement "method_missing" (ala ruby) in c#. doing against language's overall intent , "feel", , i've never seen done in practice (with possible exception of asp.net mvc's viewbag)

operator overloading

c# has operator overloading. in experience never used.

subclassing of built in types

only if type not sealed. if sealed, extension methods trick. many/most built in types in c# sealed. 

 mappings , sequence simulation using __getitem__, __setitem__, , __delitem__, etc., "magic" methods

implementing ienumerable<t> best bet in c#. let type hook linq , kinds of goodies "free"

i have little experience python, "dynamic language of choice" has been ruby. i've professionally worked in c# since debuted. c# has come long ways , has grown pretty decent language. have "kitchen sink" feel it, can intimidating @ first. part come well. however, fluidity, flexibility, power , potential abuse ruby has not present in c#. hardcore ruby-ist (and presumably, python-ist) find c# frustrating , limiting. c# still "enterprise" language, , be.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - Mailx and Gmail nss config dir -

-
i trying send mail linux command line using mailx command. can send local domain no problem want set mail send gmail account receive mail sent gmail account. after configuring mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore } i error: resolving host smtp.gmail.com . . . done. connecting 74.125.25.109 . . . connected. missing "nss-config-dir" variable. "/home/username/dead.letter" 11/354 . . . message not sent. after looking "nss-config-dir" here , located certn.db , keyn.db files , added mail.rc so: account gmail { set smtp=smtps://smtp.gmail.com:587 set smtp-auth=login set smtp-auth-user=username@gmail.com set smtp-auth-password=password set ssl-verify=ignore set nss-config-dir=/home/user/.mozilla/firefox/location.default } now when try send mail using command: echo "sent gmail account" | mailx -v -a
Read more

c# - Is it possible to remove an existing registration from Autofac container builder? -

-
something along lines: builder.registertype<mytype>().as<itype>(); builder.registertype<mytype2>().as<itype>(); builder.deregistertype<mytype>().as<itype>() var container = builder.build(); var types = container.resolve<ienumerable<itype>>(); assert.istrue(types.count == 1); assert.istrue(types[0].gettype == typeof(mytype2)); scenario: go through bunch of assemblies , go register types want make sure have 1 implementation of given type. need before create container. track on own nice if autofac me bit. this cannot done directly using containerbuilder , unless start on new one. mind you, having first built container should able construct new container filtering away unwanted types , reusing registrations first container. this: ... var container = builder.build(); builder = new containerbuilder(); var components = container.componentregistry.registrations .where(cr => cr.activator.limittype != typ
Read more

php - Mysql PK and FK char(36) vs int(10) -

-
i have read mysql can handle indexes , searches better if tables keys integers rather char(36) uuid's. is worth converting int(10)? note: use 1 server , have have plans use multiple databases concurrently therefore removing 1 of big reasons using uuid. our tables innodb if makes difference. thanks in advance. usually rdbms can handle integer keys pk more efficient, other datatypes. reason how build index column, yes: long dont require string (or other typed) keys, should use integers. however: char(36) , int(10) far away being equal, because int(10) much smaller, char(36). dont know, if require many different keys, should keep in mind. update, complete last paragraph: int(10) 32-bit, char(36) 36 - ^byte^ (= 288-bit). not mean, int consumes less space, means, char(36) has 4 times more different keys.
Read more